Greener and Better Roofs

A Roadmap for San Francisco
SPUR Memorandum
October 21, 2013

SPUR members tour a green roof in San Francisco's Civic Center. Photo by Sergio Ruiz for SPUR.

The hard, grey, uninteresting rooftops that cover as much as 30 percent of San Francisco’s land area could be more beneficial to the city and to the environment. But more productive and sustainable uses of rooftops — solar panels, wind turbines, green stormwater infrastructure, urban agriculture, publicly accessible open space and natural habitat — are often more expensive to install and maintain. There are often barriers that prevent better uses from being easily implemented, and upgrading or retrofitting the roofs of existing buildings may be even more challenging.

Many cities around the world have incentives and even regulations requiring green roofs in new construction. But they're still seen as somewhat exotic and niche in San Francisco, and the city lags substantially behind others such as Portland, New York, Chicago and Toronto in both green roof policy and on-the-roof implementation. This report asks what can be done to support the development and broader implementation of green roofs in San Francisco. It considers the city’s existing policies that support green roofs and creates a policy roadmap for how to move forward on green roofs in the coming months and years. 

 

About the Authors: 

The SPUR Board of Directors reviewed, debated and adopted this report on October 16, 2013.

Primary authors: Laura Tam, Kirstin Weeks, Eli Zigas

SPUR Green Roof Task Force:
Laura Tam, SPUR (co-chair); Kirstin Weeks, ARUP (co-chair); Eli Zigas, SPUR; Barry Hooper, SF Environment; Ken Kortkamp, SF Public Utilities Commission; Jeff Joslin, SF Planning Department; Charles Wright, Tishman Speyer; Ken Cleaveland, Building Owners and Managers Association SF; Stephanie Ciancio, Green Roof Alliance; Lisa Lee Benjamin, Evo Catalyst; Kay Cheng, SF Planning Department; Paul Travis, SF Department of Public Works; and Megan White, Webcor