|
|
-
SPUR REPORT
May 1, 2009
San Francisco can fight global warming through smart changes to local policy. What can we do to lead the way?
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on February 18, 2009
In the fight against global warming, there are many things San Francisco can do. In this report, SPUR evaluated 42 options for the City to reduce carbon emissions in San Francisco and the Bay Area.
-
SPUR REPORT
March 1, 2009
Bringing work back to the city
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on January 21, 2009
How can we bring more jobs into the region's most transit-rich employment center? SPUR proposes a sustainable plan for transit-oriented job growth in the Bay Area.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 1, 2009
A guide to our city's privately owned public open spaces
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 19, 2008
Dozens of office buildings in San Francisco include privately-owned public open spaces -- or "POPOS." Some are merely provisional, while others are hidden gems.
-
SPUR REPORT
October 17, 2008
Fifty years after Bart: what's next for regional rail?
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on October 17, 2008
Building a better rail system is critical for the Bay Area. Top priority should be expanding capacity in the urban cores of San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose.
-
SPUR REPORT
September 1, 2008
How San Francisco can become a leader in the cleantech boom
SPUR REPORT
This article appears in the September 2008 issue of the Urbanist.
The Bay Area has been a hotbed of innovation since the 1970s. Today it is also one of the leading places for cleantech firms.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 16, 2008
Should the City budget be decided at the polls?
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR on January 16th, 2008
Set-asides allow citizens to set budget priorities, but they also limit flexibility.
-
SPUR REPORT
November 20, 2007
How to create middle-income housing in San Francisco
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 21, 2007
Affordable "by design" units cost less to produce because they are small, efficiently designed and do not come with a parking space.
-
SPUR REPORT
July 18, 2007
Reforming the City's Planning Department
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on March 1, 2004.
San Francisco's planning and building review processes continue to need additional reform. SPUR recommends what steps to take to make these processes work better for everyone.
-
SPUR REPORT
July 1, 2007
An update on the 2004 AIA/SPUR agenda for reform
SPUR REPORT
This report was reviewed, debated and adopted as official SPUR policy by the SPUR Board of Directors
Changing government is never easy. But when it comes to the two departments responsible for planning our city, can we afford not to?
-
SPUR REPORT
July 1, 2007
A new neighborhood where Caltrain meets the new Central Subway
SPUR REPORT
This article appears in the July 2007 issue of the Urbanist.
Caltrain's surface rail yards represent enormous opportunities for San Francisco. In this report, SPUR proposes a plan to knit together Mission Bay with neighborhoods to the north and west.
-
SPUR REPORT
June 20, 2007
Why San Francisco needs the Central Subway
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on June 20, 2007
San Francisco is about to build its first new subway in decades. It's a great project that could be even better with a few key improvements.
-
SPUR REPORT
June 1, 2007
Can the waterfront be saved?
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on June 20, 2007
The costs of repairing, seismically upgrading and redeveloping the Port's piers are staggering.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 26, 2007
SPUR REPORT
January 22nd, 2007
-
SPUR REPORT
November 7, 2006
An ecological approach to street design
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 7, 2006.
Instead of wasting stormwater, the City could manage it as a resource. SPUR explores four strategies that allow for greater stormwater storage and infiltration of rainwater into the ground.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 18, 2006
How to fix Muni's fiscal crisis
SPUR REPORT
Approved by the SPUR Board on January 18, 2006.
<p>
SPUR addresses Muni’s deficit, by sharply reducing costs and linking financial goals to long-term transportation goals.
</p>
<p>
</p>
-
SPUR REPORT
November 16, 2005
Fixing the California Environmental Quality Act
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 16, 2005.
SPUR’s review of CEQA found that after the law’s 30-plus years of operation, developments are environmentally worse than before. We need to change the way CEQA is applied in urban settings.
-
SPUR REPORT
May 18, 2005
Increasing Muni's speed and productivity
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board May 18, 2005
SPUR addresses Muni’s deficit, proposing to boost revenues by increasing the speed of boarding, reducing waits at lights, improving transit stop spacing, and favoring primary transit corridors.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 3, 2005
Capital planning and city government
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 17, 2004.
San Francisco must face the problem of neglecting its capital investments as its physical foundation shows signs of deterioration.<br />
-
SPUR REPORT
October 1, 2004
Policies to reduce congestion
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board October 20, 2004.
New mixed-use areas raise parking congestion issues. Instead, SPUR recommends transit improvements, wider sidewalks, bike lanes, and supports plans for the Central Subway.
-
SPUR REPORT
July 21, 2004
A closer look at condominium conversion
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on July 21, 2004
While condominium conversion is one way of expanding home ownership, it frequently results in tenant displacement.
-
SPUR REPORT
July 21, 2004
Recommendations from the SPUR Transportation Committee
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on July 21, 2004.
SPUR recommends several organizational changes for Muni, including the creation of a Multimodal Planning and Project Development Department to oversee all transit and consolidate Muni and DPT.
-
SPUR REPORT
March 1, 2004
Planning the City's Future
SPUR REPORT
March 1, 2004
-
SPUR REPORT
February 18, 2004
Incentives for replacing single-story retail sites
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on February 18, 2004
This SPUR report studies underutilized retail sites, and presents the possibility of replacing these sites with mixed-use developments.
-
SPUR REPORT
August 2, 2002
The success of Proposition A
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on August 2, 2002
Proposition A has played a decisive role in expanding the production of affordable housing in San Francisco. SPUR analyzes the success of the measure and describes how it should be expanded.
-
SPUR REPORT
July 17, 2002
Targeting causes, proposing solutions
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on July 17, 2002
Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent on addressing the symptoms of homelessness in San Francisco each year.
-
SPUR REPORT
January 16, 2002
A plan for incremental change
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on January 16, 2002
This paper explores the potential to revitalize the Mid-Market Area -- a stretch of Market Street between the downtown commercial/office core and Civic Center. <br />
-
SPUR REPORT
January 1, 2002
A Citywide Plan for Transit Expansion
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on November 15, 2000
Following the success of Proposition E, SPUR calls on the SFMTA to expand transit through programs to for obtaining funding and building infrastructure.
-
SPUR REPORT
June 20, 2001
A proposal to expand the city's transit impact development fee
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on June 20, 2001
SPUR makes four recommendations to expand the successful transit impact development fee.
-
SPUR REPORT
April 1, 2001
A Painless Way to Increase the Supply of Housing
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on April 18, 2001
Allowing homeowners to add secondary rental units to their property is one of the most promising strategies we have for increasing the supply of housing in San Francisco without significantly change t
-
SPUR REPORT
July 19, 2000
Making the transportation and land use connection
SPUR REPORT
Adopted by the SPUR Board on July 19, 2000.
The answers to SOMA's problems can be found simply by looking at what makes our downtown successful: small block sizes, mixed land uses, housing, transit and better parking management.
|
|
|