San Francisco's Housing Crisis
San Francisco's Housing Crisis
The Basis of the Coalition
Over the last 20 years, San Francisco has built an average of 1,000 units annually. The Association of Bay Area Government's Regional Housing Needs Determination says we need at least three times that much. At the same time, tens of thousands of housing units are being built annually in the Bay Area's greenbelt, in new auto-dependent suburbs. In 1999, SPUR and Urban Ecology convened members of the environmental, business, affordable housing, and development communities to tackle the root causes of the lack of housing production in San Francisco. Disparate housing advocates and interests such as the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, Mission Housing Development Corporation, Greenbelt Alliance, League of Conservation Voters, Merchants of Upper Market & Castro, and Planning Association of the Richmond gathered at SPUR to find common ground. The San Francisco Housing Action Coalition was born.
The founding organizations disagreed on many fronts, and the Coalition has never attempted to build consensus on such controversial issues as rent control or how much new office development to allow. Instead, we agreed to just one common goal: increase the supply of well-designed, appropriately-located housing. We are a minimalist coalition, and do not spend a lot of time doing consensus-building. You join the coalition if you agree with the goal, and don't if you don't.
Organizational Structure
The
model of organization is inspired by community organizing groups such
as the San Francisco Organizing Project. In this model, membership is
made up of organizations (not individuals) -- and these membership
groups provide a significant chunk of the operating funding. For the
first four years of our existence, we were almost entirely a
volunteer-driven organization, and existed on a sliding-scale dues
structure. Building on our successes, and with fiscal sponsorship from
Greenbelt Alliance, this year the Housing Action Coalition was able to
secure foundation grants from the Evelyn and Walter Haas, Jr. Fund and
The San Francisco Foundation. Together with membership dues -- now 25
organizations strong -- the Coalition was able to hire its first
full-time staff person this January. With full-time staff on board,
capacity on all fronts has been increased.
Major Accomplishments
The
Coalition has drawn on its diverse connections and collective knowledge
to pursue several strategies: regulatory reform, pro-housing public
education, and housing project endorsements. Through regulatory reform,
the Coalition has identified major barriers to housing development in
the Planning Code and has advocated for proposed changes. Pro-housing
public education has involved outreach, especially to neighborhood
groups to help them understand the value of increased housing
production. The Endorsement Committee takes a careful look at housing
development projects and advocates for their approval, if they meet our
critieria. The Coalition can boast several accomplishment to date:
1. Better Neighborhoods Program
One
of the barriers to housing production is the lack of consensus around
development. The lack of clear planning guidelines in many
neighborhoods leaves developers without predictability in the
development process. Not knowing what they're getting into, developers
may face unanticipated opposition and regulatory barriers -- and they
very well may avoid developing in the city altogether. At the same
time, neighbors will likely not support new development unless it's
coupled with neighborhood-serving amenities, such as well-maintained
parks and improved transit. With the advocacy of the Housing Action
Coalition, the Better Neighborhoods Program was the first time in a
decade that the City Planning Department was funded to create specific
plans that addressed all these issues pro-actively. (See SPUR
newsletter, August 1999, "Specific Area Plans: Building Consensus for
Infill Housing.") After two years of community workshops, the draft
plans for the three areas -- Market and Octavia, Central Waterfront,
and Balboa Park -- have now been released (see
www.betterneighborhoods.org).
2. Inclusionary Zoning
Inclusionary
Zoning is a concept used in dozens of California cities to ensure that
for-profit developers produce some below-market-rate units. Previously,
San Francisco had a weak inclusionary guideline. After two years of
negotiations within the Housing Action Coalition -- mostly between the
for-profit and non-profit developers -- we worked with the City
Attorney's office to craft an ordinance everyone could agree with: 12%
below market rate units on site or 17% off-site. Introduced by
Supervisor Mark Leno, it was passed overwhelmingly by the Board of
Supervisors and signed into law by the Mayor in 2002.
3. 700 Units Approved
The
Housing Action Coalition has endorsed 19 projects -- 11 of which have
been approved thus far by the city, totaling 700 new units. In addition
to a letter of support, Coalition members have spoken at Planning
Commission and Supervisorial hearings in favor of the projects. The
full Housing Action Coalition worked together to determine criteria for
endorsing housing development projects. Developers themselves are not
permitted to sit on the Endorsement Committee.
A Balance of Membership
Naturally,
with such a pro-housing agenda, many for-profit companies with
development-interests have expressed interest in joining the SFHAC.
Early on, the group recognized the need to balance financial interest
with advocacy interest, in order to be politically effective in a
climate of developer suspicion. Therefore, the membership policy is
that no more than 50% of our members can have a financial interest in
development (and that includes developer's attorneys and architects).
Our membership recruitment approach follows: one developer can join for
every environmental or neighborhood group that joins.
Building a Pro-Housing Culture
A
dramatic increase in the supply of housing is in the long-term public
interest. However, that interest is sorely under-represented in San
Francisco politics. For the Housing Action Coalition to approach its
goal of creating housing that meets the needs of present and future
residents of San Francisco , we ultimately
must change the attitude towards housing development. In addition to
specific reforms and projects, the Coalition must help shape public
opinion. Through neighborhood planning, public meetings,
the media, and old-fashioned community-organizing, the Housing Action
Coalition hopes to shift the political climate of San Francisco from
NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard) to YIMBY (Yes in My Back Yard). Calling on
the long-term, collective interest of the city, we hope to see a
pro-housing, inclusive vision integrated at every level of government
and the public.
Kate White is executive director of the Housing Action Coalition. Prior to that she was co-director of City CarShare. For more information, contact her at LkateWhite@hotmail.com.
|
Housing Action Coalition Mission The Housing Action Coalition exists to advocate for the creation of well-designed, well-located housing that meets the needs of present and future residents of San Francisco. We aim to build a strong and diverse coalition of groups united by a shared interest in solving San Francisco's housing crisis. Goals
Priorities for 2003
|





