Blog » blog
- April 9, 2012
Creating a Community Vision for Stockton Street
By Noah Christman, Deland Chan, Vivian Chang and Cindy Wu
The Stockton Street Enhancement Project, spearheaded by Chinatown Community Development Center (CCDC) and SPUR, brought Chinatown and SPUR stakeholders together to discuss ways to preserve the economic and cultural vitality of Stockton Street while offering opportunity areas for improvement through the next decade. The project, made possible by a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, included a walking tour and two workshops designed to address issues with the highly trafficked corridor.
Stockton Street has evolved over the years to become an example of true urbanization, replete with a strong transit network, multigenerational families living in tightly knit spaces, hundreds of mom-and-pop stores and a bustling streetlife. It has a dense immigrant population and plays an important role as a regional hub for both Asian Americans and tourists from around the world. Its success lies in its strong history of grassroots organizing to protect Chinatown’s affordability, culture and urban form.
Buildings along the corridor are typically mixed-use — with retail on the ground floor and housing above — and between three and four stories in height. In addition to storefronts, there are also many social services and institutions (i.e. health, education, religious and family associations) that line the busy blocks of Stockton Street.
A timelapse video of Stockton Street shows the challenges of navigating this heavily used corridor. Video by Michael Waldrep.The residential base, small businesses and marketplace feel are assets that should be preserved and enhanced as the neighborhood experiences change from major public projects such as the new Central Subway. Connecting Chinatown to Union Square and SoMa before fusing with the existing T-Third line as it extends to Visitacion Valley and the Bayview, the Central Subway could prove to be an catalyst for change along the Stockton Street corridor, reshaping the street’s usage patterns and drastically changing its character. The community planning process framed by CCDC and SPUR sets the overarching vision of how to preserve and enhance the neighborhood amid these oncoming changes.
With an estimated 20,000 people living in Chinatown’s 30 square blocks, many of whom are crowded into 8-by-10-foot single room occupancy units, Chinatown is the city’s most densely inhabited neighborhood. The average median income of these residents is $18,000 per year, with more than a third of the population being seniors who live on fixed incomes. The neighborhood is made up of 88 percent renters, and only 10 percent of households own private vehicles. Future plans for Stockton Street must take into account the needs of the people who live in Chinatown by focusing on the creation of safe streets, affordable housing, open space, timely and efficient transit and access to social services and educational and religious institutions.
Stockton Street is also an important cultural and social hub for Asian Americans from many of San Francisco’s immigrant neighborhoods, including Visitacion Valley, SoMa, Outer Mission and Excelsior, who take the 30, 45 and 8X buses that pass through the corridor. Other Asian Americans enclaves in the Sunset, Richmond, East Bay and South Bay depend similarly on Muni and BART as their connection to Chinatown. Regardless of their location, San Francisco’s Chinatown serves as the confluence for the Bay Area’s Asian Americans, with a large proportion of them attending school, worshipping, visiting friends or shopping in the neighborhood.
Through a walking tour and two workshops, one held in Chinatown and one held at the SPUR Urban Center, Chinatown CDC and SPUR implemented a rigorous community engagement process to better understand the needs along Stockton Street. These public discussions brought together a diverse group of stakeholders — including monolingual residents living along the corridor, local merchants, property owners, architects and planners — to talk about potential opportunities for change. Bilingual and bicultural, the workshops were conducted to be participatory and engaging for all groups involved.
At the start of each workshop, SPUR and CCDC staff analyzed the current state of the Stockton Street corridor and shared case studies, both local and international, as possible models for its future, after whichparticipants divided into smaller groups to run through three different brainstorming exercises: 1) current strengths and challenges of Stockton Street, 2) priority areas to focus on for its future and 3) the connection of the future Chinatown Central Subway Station to Stockton Street.
Participants quickly discovered that there is no single solution for Chinatown’s Stockton Street. On the contrary, there are many elements that work well, but have also proven to be challenges for functionality. For example, retail displays encroaching on to the sidewalk may initially seem innocuous and complementary to the street’s character, but when combined with open basement trapdoors, parking meters, unloading trucks and a multitude of newspaper stands these components quickly narrow the navigable sidewalk space.
Workshop participants record their ideas for Stockton Street.Participants noted a similar dichotomy with the corridor’s transportation options. While the continuous flow of Muni buses provides near-seamless transit connections, their frequent stops also create traffic congestion. With pedestrians often forced into the street due to sidewalk obstructions, this congestion brings with it very real danger. Compounding this is the lack of open space along Stockton Street, with only Willie “Woo Woo” Wong Playground providing an oasis from the activity of the street.
In the second exercise the workshop groups identified many of the same priorities and solutions for the corridor. Short-term proposals included restricting loading and unloading during peak pedestrian hours, consolidating sidewalk stands and beautifying the street through painting, cleanup and improved lighting. Participants looked to similar streets around the world for ideas, taking inspiration from flexible parking options and sidewalk bulbouts, high-volume bus stops and pedestrian-scale full-spectrum lighting. Long-term ideas posed included eliminating a south-bound travel lane to free up transit and pedestrian flow, creating “flex delivery zones” dependent on the time of day and prioritizing travel lanes through traffic pattern analysis. Also proposed was the idea of “shoplets,” compact retail spaces that take over on-street parking in a similar manner to a parklet.
The final brainstorming exercise focused on the role of Stockton Street as the future terminus for the Central Subway. Participants immediately identified the opportunities in crafting the station as a hub of activity, art, business and culture while suggesting plaza space and rooftop decks as a respite from the street, along with improved signage and wayfinding for visitors. Finally, participants felt that the subway station’s construction could prove to be the impetus for the evolution of the Stockton Street corridor and the grand catalyst for lighting, transportation and façade improvements along its extent.
Participants in the Chinatown workshop discuss solutions for Stockton Street.The feedback from the Chinatown workshop resulted in pragmatic ideas for positive and lasting change for the corridor, while the SPUR workshop, comprised mostly of working professionals, came up with more technical and creative thoughts on possible changes. SPUR and CCDC hope the City of San Francisco will prioritize these ideas in their plans as they pursue opportunities within the corridor.
Tags: community planning - April 6, 2012
SF Approves First "Neighborhood Urban Agriculture" Permit
by Eli Zigas, Food Systems and Urban Agriculture Program Manager
On March 9, 2012, San Francisco issued its first zoning permit for “neighborhood urban agriculture.” The change of use permit, given to Little City Gardens, allows the small urban farming business to grow produce for sale at its three-quarter-acre market garden in the Mission Terrace neighborhood. It is the first permit issued under San Francisco’s pioneering urban agriculture zoning guidelines, which Mayor Lee signed into law in April 2011.
The permit is both a victory for Little City Gardens and the culmination of a multi-year effort to legalize commercial urban farming in residential neighborhoods in San Francisco. The permit, is, at its core, a simple recognition that the previously vacant lot is now being used to grow food according to basic guidelines. Securing the permit, however, was not simple. The process involved:
- four visits to the permitting office
- plan review by the Planning Department, Department of Building Inspection, Public Utilities Commission and Central Permit Bureau
- a $300 fee
- hours of conversation between the applicants and the various agencies about the new zoning law and the practice of urban farming
Little City Gardens has been at the forefront of trying to find a legal path to sell what it grows in the city. Now, having set the precedent of successfully securing a change of use permit, the path ahead for other aspiring urban farmers in San Francisco will be a little smoother.
- April 4, 2012
Selling What You Cook at Home
by Eli Zigas, Food Systems and Urban Agriculture Program Manager
Let’s say you’ve got a great jam recipe. Or perhaps you make some mean pickles. Your friends keep telling you that you should quit your day job and follow your culinary passion. But unless you’ve got quite a bit of savings or other access to capital, following your friends’ advice is a pricey proposition.
That’s because in California, you can’t sell any food prepared in a home kitchen. And access to a licensed commercial kitchen costs money — usually starting at around $30 per hour in the Bay Area. Add your ingredient and labor costs, and it becomes a decent investment to test your business idea.
A proposed piece of state legislation, the California Homemade Food Act, would change all that. Called the “cottage food bill,” the legislation would allow Californians to sell certain items produced from their home kitchen. Similar to legislation already enacted in more than 30 other states, the bill comes with certain restrictions, including only allowing the sale of what the health department refers to as “non potentially hazardous” items, which basically means products that would not go bad sitting on a shelf for a few days.
On March 27, supporters of the law — including Christina Oatfield of the Sustainable Economies Law Center and Shakirah Simley, owner of Slow Jams — discussed the proposal alongside Richard Lee of the San Francisco Department of Public Health at an event co-sponsored by Kitchen Table Talks, 18 Reasons and SPUR. Lee raised a number of concerns that he and other public health officials statewide shared. The proposed legislation would give the health department much less authority to inspect home kitchens that sold goods to the public than what it has for inspecting licensed commercial kitchens. He expressed concerns about whether home producers would follow best practices regarding hand washing, sanitizing surfaces, pet contamination, vermin, appropriate labeling of allergens and distinguishing what is and is not potentially hazardous food. Oatfield responded by noting that that advocates were working with the health officials to add amendments to address some of their concerns.
She also discussed the issue of scale-appropriate regulation — the idea that the less risk an activity poses to society, the less regulation it requires (and vice-versa). Since home kitchens produce much less volume and serve fewer customers than commercial kitchens, the thinking goes, they should not be subject to the same inspections. One of the aspects of the legislation currently under negotiation is whether a cap, based on sales volume, should be added to prevent a home kitchen from producing at the scale of a commercial kitchen.
The legislation is just beginning to make its way through the California Assembly. It is almost certain to be amended as food-producing entrepreneurs push for lower barriers to entry and public health regulators push to ensure food safety. But, if it does become law, Californians would be able to both sell what they grow from their home garden and what they cook in their home kitchen.
- April 2, 2012
SPUR Announces June 2012 Ballot Positions
By Corey Marshall, Good Government Policy DirectorThis June’s primary election will bear little resemblance to the contentious ballot San Franciscans considered last November. Gone are the competing pension reform measures, sales taxes and bonds. We’re left with two measures, both placed on the ballot by voter petition.
While the June slate may be lean, voters should take the time to fully research the measures on the ballot this spring. They’re important not just to how the city operates but also to how we choose to fund city services.
Prop. A addresses how the city contracts for garbage-collection and recycling services; this measure would require the city to own all supporting facilities (it currently does not) and competitively bid the service. Prop. B limits how the Recreation and Parks Department funds Coit Tower, which could create a precedent for similar limitations at other facilities throughout the parks system. These measures could both have potentially expensive implications.
After hearing an in-depth report from our Ballot Analysis Committee, SPUR’s board of directors voted to take the following positions regarding the two propositions on the San Francisco ballot this June:
Proposition A: Competitive Bidding for Garbage Collection and Disposal
Ordinance that would require the city to use a competitive bidding process to award separate franchises or contracts for five distinct categories of waste collection and processing in San Francisco, and would require the city to own all processing and transfer facilities utilized as part of these contracts.
SPUR position: NOProposition B: Coit Tower Policy
Policy statement to protect and preserve the murals in Coit Tower and to strictly limit commercial activities in the tower.
SPUR position: NOStay tuned for our in-depth analysis of these measures at spur.org/voterguide as Election Day approaches.
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
SPUR Honors Ed Harrington with Life Achievement Award
SPUR’s 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
This year, SPUR honored Ed Harrington with a Lifetime Achievement Award for his service to the City and County of San Francisco, including unparalleled fiscal leadership and managerial excellence through five mayoral administrations. Harrington currently serves as the general manager of the San Francisco Public Utility Commission, a regional utility that delivers water to 2.5 million Bay Area customers, collects and treats wastewater and storm water, and provides hydroelectric and other renewable power resources for San Francisco municipal customers. From 1991 to 2008, Harrington served as San Francisco’s controller, where he administered San Francisco's $6.1 billion budget. Before becoming controller, he worked with the SFPUC, the Municipal Railway, the Water Department and the Hetch Hetchy Water and Power System.
Watch our video about Ed's work:
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
Good Government Awards: How Harlan Kelly Led the Next Generation of SF Utilities
SPUR's 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
Harlan L. Kelly, Jr. was honored for his outstanding leadership in the delivery and implementation of the SF Public Utilities Commission’s 10-year capital improvement program for water, sewer and power, and his specific innovation on the Construction Management Information System (CMIS) to address inefficiencies in large, complex capital projects. By streamlining and coordinating tasks, and enhancing transparency and accountability with a cloud-based system, the new CMIS allows project managers throughout dispersed project areas to make faster and more informed decisions. The system has already contributed to an overall Water System Improvement Program cost savings of $167.6 million.
Watch our video on Harlan’s work:
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
Good Government Awards: How SF’s Tax Automation Team Took the City Paperless
SPUR's 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
The Municipal Tax Automation Team — Darrell Ascano, Tajel Shah and Rebecca Villareal-Mayer — was honored for its outstanding teamwork and achievement in upgrading the technology used to collect and process the majority of the city’s General Fund revenue. By choosing an aggressive, non-incremental approach — upgrading the entire system over eight months — the team executed a complex project that has changed the way tax information is collected and funds are received. This has resulted in increased taxpayer compliance and expense savings.
Watch our video on the tax team’s work:
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
Good Government Awards: How Jocelyn Quintos Modernized Public Works
SPUR's 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
Jocelyn Quintos was honored for her outstanding leadership and management of the Department of Public Work’s accounting operations. Her diligence and dedication in working across many city departments led, in a mere six months, to the automation of the department’s Contract Service Orders, Change Orders, and HRC Compliance/Payment Authorization systems. This resulted in a significant reduction in processing times, faster mobilization of contractors to start work, and complete elimination of delays associated with paper-based approval processes.
Watch our video on Jocelyn’s work:
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
Good Government Awards: How Steven Castille Made SF Parks World Class
SPUR's 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
Steven Castile was honored for his commitment to preserving public access to parks while ensuring environmental sustainability of parkland, managing the city’s agronomical practices for five golf courses, three stadiums (including Candlestick and Kezar Stadiums) and 220 parks. His particular accomplishments in bringing Harding Park up to the standards of the PGA Tour exemplify his ingenuity and creativity in staff management and resource allocation to create a world-class golf venue that generates visibility and income for the city.
Watch our video on Steven’s work:
Tags: good government - March 23, 2012
Good Government Awards: How SFpark Revolutionized Parking, for Everyone
SPUR's 32nd annual Good Government Awards, held March 19, honored City of San Francisco employees who have performed exceptionally, becoming models for other agencies and cities around the country.
The SFpark Pilot Program team — Jay Primus, George Reynolds, Steven Lee and Lorraine Fuqua — was honored for its implementation of its groundbreaking smart parking management program. SFpark is the most progressive parking management program in the United States; using sensors to gather and share real-time data about available parking spots, it provides convenience to drivers, reduces traffic from people looking for parking and moves the city toward a demand-based pricing system. The SFpark team designed and implemented a large pilot program under tight time constraints, demonstrating innovation within an area of the public realm that is often taken for granted.
Watch our video on SFPark’s work:
Tags: good government





